3 Types of Bonus Details on Italian Vital Records

I've written in depth about how to understand Italian vital records. But I haven't told you about these important bonus details. Let's take a look at 3 easy-to-miss types of information on Italian vital records.

Don't overlook these 3 types of bonus details on vital records.

1. Margin Notes

Always check Italian birth records for handwritten paragraphs in the margins. You may find valuable details about the person's life that you won't find anywhere else. These include:

• Who they married, on what date, and sometimes in which town.
• A correction to one of the names written on the document. For example, the clerk who wrote the document may have written the wrong last name for the baby's mother. A margin note provides the correction.
• Recognition of a baby born out of wedlock. If a man and woman have a baby before they marry, a margin note can tell you their names and when they married. If a woman reports her baby's birth, and doesn't name the father, a margin note may have it. This happens when a man steps up to claim the child as his own.
• Death date. This margin note is more common in 1900s birth records when the baby died very young.
• "Born dead". Nato morto (born dead) or senza vita (without life) in the margin or after the baby's name tell you this was a stillbirth.
• Confirmed later. Sometimes a margin note says vista (viewed) or verificato (verified), along with a date and the mayor's name. This tells you the mayor confirmed the birth after the writing of the document. It can also mean a clerk reviewed the document when asked to confirm the birth for the person's marriage.
• Father died in the war. World War I caused an enormous amount of Italian casualties. Look for a margin note on birth records during la Guerra Nazionale to see if this baby's father died in the war.
• Father's death date. Sometimes a baby's birth happens after their father has died. When this happens, look at the handwritten paragraph beneath the baby's name. It may contain the father's date of death.

2. Diversi (Various)

Don't overlook the documents filed under the category Diversi. There is usually a very small number of these documents for any given year. They are most common in the years before 1866. They can include:

• Stillbirths. These records often do not give a name to the stillborn baby. You will learn the parents' names and the sex of the baby, as well as on which date the stillbirth happened.
• Out-of-town deaths. If a citizen of an Italian town dies in another place, that place must notify their hometown. These notifications often contain a great deal of detail.
• Corrections. If a birth record has a margin note about a correction, the diversi record provides all the details. Let's say Giuseppe is preparing to get married and must provide a copy of his birth record. But they discover an error on the original record. The clerk said Giuseppe was a female named Giuseppa. Uh oh! The clerk must file a correction to the name and sex before Giuseppe can marry.
• Abandoned or out-of-wedlock babies. There seem to be a few babies found on doorsteps or born to unnamed fathers each year. You may find their births with all the other births, or in the diversi documents. If you find a record for an abandoned baby, look for the word projetto (for a boy) or projetta (for a girl). The mayor, clerk, or midwife will make up a name for the child. This document may tell you:
  • Who found the baby.
  • Where and when they found the baby.
  • How many days old the baby appears to be.
  • Any identifying items found with the baby. These can include a blanket, clothing, or a religious token that only the parents can identify. They can use this detail to claim the baby later. An identifying item is a segno—a mark or a sign. If you see senza segno, there was nothing to use for later identification.
• Recognition of a baby born out of wedlock. You may find this in a margin note on a birth record, but check the diversi documents for more detail. I found a document for an abandoned baby adopted by a couple who lost their own two babies in infancy.

From marriage dates to abandoned babies to very late birth records, know where to look for these details.

3. Different Parts and Series

Most Italian record books you'll find online contain an image of the book cover and a cover page. The cover page tells you what you're looking at. For example, Registro degli Atti di Matrimonio—register of marriage certificates.

Have you ever found a second or third cover page toward the end of a register? These cover pages are for different document categories. They have labels such as Parte II, Serie A (Part 2, Series A), Parte II, Serie B (Part 2, Series B), or Parte II, Serie C (Part 2, Series C).

In one of my ancestral hometowns, the 1930s Parte I (Part 1) marriage section is always empty. The bulk of the marriages are in Parte II, Serie A. I never gave it much thought before.

Let's look at these different parts. Understanding these distinctions can be very important to your family tree research.

Marriage records (How to Read Italian Marriage Records):

• Part 1 marriage records are for couples married in the town hall by the mayor or another official. You may see a margin note telling you when the couple married in the church.
• Part 2, Series A marriage records are for couples married by a priest or other religious official.
• Part 2, Series B contains out-of-town marriages. If a man and woman came from different towns, they almost always married in her town. So Part 2, Series B records are often for a man from your town who married a woman from another town.
• Part 2, Series C is for special circumstances. They are completely handwritten because they vary too much for a pre-printed form. It could be a marriage-by-proxy, where the groom is in another country at the time. It could be a marriage of two townspeople who married someplace else.

Birth records (How to Read an Italian Birth Record):

• Part 1 is the most straightforward. These are births that happened in this town.
• Part 2, Series A birth records tell us when a townswoman gave birth in another town. She may have been visiting relatives or traveling, but her baby would live in her hometown.
• Part 2, Series B records are completely handwritten. They are for:
  • babies born to townspeople either out-of-town or out-of-country
  • births reported late. By law, fathers had to report their child's birth right away or face a penalty. But some birth reports were very late.

My great aunt's husband and his brother were born in New York City to Italian immigrants. But the family went back to Italy. I found handwritten copies of their 1905 and 1907 Bronx birth records in the 1909 Part 2, Series A birth records in their parents' Italian hometown.

My great grandfather Giovanni Sarracino's father didn't report his birth until Giovanni needed proof of his birth to get married. I found his 1876 birth record in Parte II, Serie B of the 1898 birth register. My Sarracino clan may have been rebellious because they reported a bunch of births late.

Death records (How to Read an Italian Death Record):

• Part 1 is the most straightforward. These are deaths that happened in this town.
• Part 2, Series A records are for townspeople who died in another place.
• Part 2, Series B records are also out-of-town deaths. But these notifications come from places like:
  • the military (for a soldier who died)
  • a prison (for a prisoner who died in custody)
  • a hospital (for a patient who died)
• Part 2, Series C records are out-of-country death notifications from the Italian Consulate. Many of these records will lead you to find a death certificate in your country.

Many Part 2 documents can open up new research options for you. If a marriage record says a bride or groom is from another town, you can search for their original birth record. When a death record tells you a person died in a hospital in Naples, you can see if it still exists and record the address.

While I knew there were different parts and series, I never documented the reasons before. And I have been wondering about all the empty marriage Part 1's in my towns.

I hope you'll use these explanations to guide your research. Sometimes they're the only clue to lead you to another town.

See Your Ancient DNA Origins on MyHeritage

I've taken only one DNA test. In 2012 I tested with AncestryDNA and then convinced my parents and husband to test. Later I uploaded the 4 AncestryDNA tests to MyHeritage and other DNA websites.

Last week MyHeritage released a new feature. "Ancient Origins" sets them apart from the other major DNA websites. (You'll find it in the DNA menu on MyHeritage.) I've traced my ancestors as far back as the late 1690s using a paper trail. They lived in one small section of Southern Italy from at least that time. Let's go back further. Here's my Ancient Origins Breakdown.

Trace your DNA origins through ancient times on MyHeritage.

Bronze Age

In this most ancient time frame, MyHeritage says I'm:

• 50.4% Anatolian (3400 BC–1500 BC), which is modern-day Turkey.
• 29.2% European Farmer (6300 BC–2800 BC), which covers most of Europe. My highest concentration is in Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, and Hungary.
• 13.4% Western Steppe (3300 BC–2600 BC), north of the Black Sea with the highest concentration in Russia.
• 7% Canaanite (1800 BC–1100 BC), along the Eastern Mediterranean shore. My highest concentration is in Lebanon.

Iron Age

In this still-BC time frame, MyHeritage says I'm:

• 46.6% Anatolian (780 BC–30 BC), modern-day Turkey.
• 44.2% Italic and Etruscan (900 BC–200 BC), hurray! Here's where my Italian roots begin. The highest concentration a bit north of my ancestors' paper trail.
• 9.2% Phoenician (1000 BC–330 BC), with the highest concentration in Lebanon.

Roman Era

Now we're coming out of BC times into AD times. This is where it gets exciting for me. MyHeritage says I'm:

• 94.4% Roman Italy (20 BC–600 AD). This covers the entire Italian peninsula with the highest concentration around Rome.
• 5.6% Roman Sardinia (400–500 AD), still Italy, but off the western coast on the island of Sardinia.

This pleases me to no end.

Middle Ages

No surprise for me here, but a lovely confirmation of my ethnicity. MyHeritage says I'm:

• 100% Italian (650–1450 AD). I was a blonde-haired blue-eyed baby, so people never suspected I was Italian, but holy cow am I Italian! I do know that my rare maiden name of Iamarino existed in my grandfather's hometown in the 1400s. This new MyHeritage feature confirms the absolute depth of my Italian roots.

My parents' DNA tests show very similar Ancient Origins in each era. They each have trace origins I did not inherit—Germanic and Sub-Saharan African.

Make sure you watch the Ancient Origins video clips. Most genetic groups have an AI video clip of a person from this area talking about their homeland. Mine all looked a lot more Italian than I do. Although, if I ignore their coloring, I do see a similarity in facial structure.

My husband is a different story. His parents' families came from Japan. His first AncestryDNA result said he was 100% Japanese. He still is, but now his test shows 3% Southern Japanese Islands and 97% Japan.

But the earliest inhabitants of Japan had to come from somewhere else, right? So what does MyHeritage show for my husband's Ancient Origin Breakdown?

By the Middle Ages, Paul was:

• 84.4% Japanese, without touching the Japanese islands in the south.
• 14.8% Sinitic, which is Chinese and doesn't quite reach North Korea.
• 0.8% Southeast Asian. This covers an area that touches Malaysia, Vietnam and Cambodia, and Indonesia.

His breakdown was almost identical in the Roman Era, but going back to the Iron Age, China takes on a larger role.

• 60.4% Sinitic (Chinese).
• 20.4% Amur River, which is the part of China (and Russia) closest to northern Japan.
• 14.2% Jomon, which is Japan before they called it Japan.
• 5% Southeast Asian, covering the same territories I listed above.

In the Bronze Age, Paul's map looks much the same as it does in the every other era. But the concentrations are more specific.

• 52.6% Yellow River, which is an area of China west of Beijing.
• 15% Amur River, which is in his Iron Age breakdown in a somewhat higher percentage.
• 14.6% Liao River, which is the part of China west of North Korea.
• 14.4% Jomon. It seems some of his ancestors were always in Japan.
• 3.4% Southeast Asian, in a smaller percentage than he had in the Iron Age.

Taken altogether, Paul is overwhelmingly Japanese. But he does have ancient roots in China, and a few in Southeast Asia. He's almost as concentrated as I am.

MyHeritage Ancient Origins offers more than the Ancient Origin Breakdowns I've explored above. There's also a Hunter-Gatherer and Farmer Breakdown you may find interesting.

You can also explore the Sample Database to learn more about any of your genetic groups. For example, I looked into Phoenician, which came up on my map as Lebanon. It is in Lebanon, but also to a small extent in Sardinia, Italy. And Sardinia is in my Roman Era results.

The Genetic Distance Maps show where you are on a scatter plot of different DNA groups. My map is Southern Italian. But I have genetic similarity to Central Italians, Ashkenazi Jews, and Greeks. My parents' maps are almost identical to mine. Paul's map is Japanese with genetic similarity to Koreans, Chinese, and Tibetans.

Who else in the world has similar DNA to you?

I would love to see your Genetic Distance Map if you're much more of a mixture than we are. What type of cluster are you in if your four grandparents came from very different places?

Another Option

Yes, Ancient Origins sets MyHeritage apart from all the big DNA competitors. But there is another website for ancient results. I never wrote about it because I didn't know how trustworthy its results are. I uploaded my DNA tests to mytrueancestry.com a long time ago. Now I can compare the results to MyHeritage to see if they're reliable.

My True Ancestry says I'm:

• 25.1% Roman, with origins that match the Italic and Etruscan group from MyHeritage. It even says the Etruscans were from Anatolia…Turkey!
• 12.9% Hellenic Roman, which is Southern Italians who came from Greece. No doubt.
• 9.06% Carian, which is a subset of Anatolian…again, Turkey.
• 7.5% Ancient Greek.
• 6.88% Byzantine Empire. The sprawling Byzantine Empire included Italy, Turkey, the Middle East, and Greece. That tracks with the MyHeritage results.

The information on MyHeritage is more robust, but My True Ancestry is a good option. It's easy to upload DNA kits. You'll need to make a separate account for each DNA test using different email addresses.

Paul's results on My True Ancestry are:

• 35.8% Tokugawa Shogunate. That's Japan.
• 28.2% Licchavi Kingdom or today's Nepal. This is the one I had doubts about, but it isn't far off the areas shown on MyHeritage.
• 17.4% Han Dynasty, covering parts of China that mesh with Paul's MyHeritage results.
• 14.9% Three Kingdoms of Korea (the bottom of South Korea). The MyHeritage Genetic Distance Map does show his genetic similarity to Koreans.

The percentages are different between the websites. But I now have a higher opinion of My True Ancestry than I did before. With a free account, you can also see Modern Populations. I'm all Italian and Greek. Paul is very Japanese and bits of Chinese. There's even a genetic distance map.

I do prefer how MyHeritage breaks down the time periods with such precision.

Tell me what you think of your results on MyHeritage or My True Ancestry.

A 15% discount for readers of Fortify Your Family Tree!

And speaking of DNA tests:

• This Number is Crucial to Your DNA Match Research
• How to Use DNA Matches to Go Beyond Vital Records
• 4 Practical Methods for Identifying a DNA Match

Finally! A Great Tool to Transcribe Handwritten Documents

Note: You must follow any of the Handwriting OCR links in this article, create your free account, and if you do make a purchase, you'll get a discount in the form of additional document credits.

Last year I wrote about two different tools that extract text from document images. Ever since then I've been using OneNote to extract text from newspaper clippings—obituaries and announcements. It does a pretty good job, but I do have to clean up the text if the image isn't very clear.

In that article, I explained how Google Docs can pull text from handwritten documents. But the results were not what I'd hoped for at all.

Then I heard about a new tool called Handwriting OCR. Let me tell you, I'm astonished at the results. Not only can it read handwriting, it formats the text results so they make perfect sense. Google Docs' formatting is awful. It's all different text sizes and colors. It seems completely random. But Handwriting OCR matches the format of the written document in straightforward text. You're going to love this new tool.

At long last, a truly exceptional tool for transcribing handwritten documents.

Here are some of my results using Handwriting OCR:

• A 1925 employment card containing pre-printed and handwritten sections. The handwriting is clear, but a bit fancy. Handwriting OCR did a perfect job. It scored 100%. It even transcribed a word the writer had crossed out!
• A poor-quality image of a completely handwritten Italian birth record from 1866. Handwriting OCR scored about 95%. Yes! You can use this tool on non-English records and paste the clean text into Google Translate. My only word of caution is to double check the spelling of any proper names and years. A couple of times it did get the year wrong. But I am so very impressed.
• My own handwritten notebook page. I have an old notebook with my notes about a bunch of Ellis Island ship manifests. It's printed, not cursive, but I can get sloppy after writing for a while. Handwriting OCR scored 100%. I could scan the entire notebook to capture all this information!
• A 1917 U.S. death certificate. How many times have you found a death certificate and been unable to make out the cause of death? Let Handwriting OCR read it for you! I'll give this result a score of 95% for one reason. It turned the mother's maiden name of Iacobacci into Jacobi. Yes, the I looks like a J, but it ignored the ending of the name. Again, double check proper names.

Then there's the big test. While writing my article two weeks ago, I downloaded Johns Hopkins' 1870 will. It's 12 images of facing pages, handwritten on long sheets of paper. I tested this tool on page 1 of the document.

Not only did Handwriting OCR score 100%, but it obliterated the competition. I uploaded the same document image to Google Docs for a test. It did a terrible job of transcription. Terrible! Take a look at the results. Note: You can click each image to see it larger.

Figure 1. The handwritten document.

Figure 2. The unacceptable results from Google Docs.

Figure 3. The outstanding results from Handwriting OCR.

Now for some more good news. You can choose 5 documents to transcribe for free when you create a free account. If you're happy, and I'm sure you will be, they have a couple of very inexpensive price options. The first option may be perfect for you: to transcribe 100 document images for $12.

Plus, the company has given me a 20% coupon only for my readers. If you buy 100 image credits for $12, you'll actually get 120 image credits. Whichever amount of credits you buy, you'll get another 20% for free. I'll bet you can complete several big projects with that deal.

All you have to do to get the free 20% is follow this link: https://www.handwritingocr.com/?ref=FAMTREE. Create your free account, give it a try, and then decide how many credits you need to complete your project.

Use your first five credits wisely. For me, that 1870 will was the ultimate test. Before you start, some very important tips:

1. Upload each page at the highest possible resolution. Blurry documents won't do you any favors.
2. Instead of uploading book spreads (two pages side by side), separate them into individual pages. This is what I did with the 1870 will.
3. Before uploading, crop the images to show only the text/handwriting itself. If the page contains, say, a rubber stamp and official signatures that you don't need, crop them out.
4. Use your favorite photo editing software to enhance the contrast if the image is faded, and sharpen the clarity if the best image available is a bit fuzzy.

Let me know how well Handwriting OCR scores on your documents.