Bad Dates Built a Brick Wall in This Family Tree

Rae's grandfather was a solid brick wall in my family tree. Until he wasn't.

A few years ago I realized I didn't know my godmother's given name. She and her husband, my mom's 1st cousin, are my godparents. She's always been in my life as simply Rae. But Rae isn't her given name. I finally asked her for some details so I could research her family tree.

A Jam-Packed Genealogy Document

Isn't it great when you find your immigrant ancestor's naturalization papers? There's so much specific information on a single page. Along with his photo, Rae's grandfather's U.S. naturalization papers gave me:

• His date of birth and place of birth
• His wife's date and place of birth (but not her last name)
• Their date and place of marriage
• The names of their 4 children
• All 4 of their dates and places of birth

Which genealogy data can you trust, and which can build a brick wall in your family tree?

Fantastic, right? Now I can go get these Italian birth and marriage records on the Antenati website. Their hometown in Italy has a tremendous number of vital records online. They include way more years than my ancestral hometowns do.

Secondary Sources? Not Good Enough

The reason I called Rae's grandfather a brick wall is this. EVERY date on his naturalization papers is WRONG. His date of birth? WRONG. His wife's date of birth? WRONG. Their date of marriage? WRONG. Their children's dates of birth? WRONG.

At some point I gave up on this branch because I couldn't find their Italian vital records. That meant I couldn't go back another generation. And I had two different possible last names for Rae's grandmother.

A secondary source in genealogy is any document written well after the fact.

A primary source is written for that specific event:

• A birth record is written shortly after the birth to document the birth.
• A marriage record is written shortly after the marriage to document the marriage.
• A death record is written shortly after the death to document the death.

Naturalization papers are a secondary source for names, dates, and places. They are written to document the naturalization process itself. That makes them a primary source for naturalization facts. The rest of the details about names and dates come from the testimony of the immigrant. That makes them secondary and unreliable.

Why was he wrong about 6 birth dates and his marriage date? I have no idea. This past weekend this family came to my attention. I decided to figure out what went wrong.

Tracking Down Primary Sources

I spent a full day on the Antenati website for their hometown. I searched countless years' worth of vital records until I demolished the brick wall. I needed to start with Rae's grandparents' marriage. That would give me her grandmother's maiden name and both their parents' names.

• Rae's grandparents did not marry on 2 Sep 1890 as the naturalization papers say. They married on 18 Sep 1887. This set of marriage records took Rae's family tree back to her great grandparents.
• Rae's grandfather was not born on 28 Feb 1864 as he said, but on 2 Mar 1864. I'll call that one "close enough", but still weird.
• Rae's grandmother (now that I discovered her full name) was not born on 2 Feb 1871 but on 6 Feb 1866.
• Rae's aunt was not named Gelorma (not a real name), but Girolama, after Rae's great grandmother. She was not born on 2 Apr 1891 but on 31 Mar 1889.
• Rae's aunt Antoniella (I expected that to be a nickname) was not born on 8 Jun 1895 but on 20 Apr 1894 and named Antonia.
• Rae's aunt Maria was not born on 2 Jul 1898 but on 17 Sep 1898 and named Maria Felicia.
• Rae's father Matteo was not born on 17 Jan 1899, but on 29 Jan 1897. His draft registration card and naturalization papers get this a little wrong. They use the date 23 Jan 1897.

Using the names of the 2 sets of newfound great grandparents, I began to expand further back in time. I found the following:

• The 1861 marriage record for Rae's grandfather's parents. This told me the names of two sets of Rae's 2nd great grandparents.
• That marriage packet led to a 2nd great grandmother's 1851 death record. That added one set of Rae's 3rd great grandparents.
• It led to the 1841 marriage of a pair of 2nd great grandparents. That added two more sets of Rae's 3rd great grandparents.
• Turning to Rae's grandmother, I found her parents' 1858 marriage record. That added two more sets of Rae's 2nd great grandparents.
• This led to the 1829 marriage record for a set Rae's 2nd great grandparents. That added two more sets of Rae's 3rd great grandparents.
• That led to a 3rd great grandmother's 1828 death record. That added one set of Rae's 4th great grandparents.

This brick wall came tumbling down in a landslide! There are a few more records I can look for. I'll try to identify the three missing sets of Rae's paternal 3rd great grandparents. And Rae's mother's roots are in the same town as her father's. I can try to identify the six missing sets of Rae's maternal 3rd great grandparents. I have no doubt I can fill in many of these blanks. Update: Yesterday I found more records and identified one of Rae's 5th great grandparents!

Revisit Your Brick Walls

The lesson here is simple. If the best you can find for your brick wall ancestor is a secondary source, don't assume it's correct. You need to do more research. You need to do more than put a name in a search box. Seek out primary sources you can examine with your own eyes.

Rae once told me (about my family—her husband's family), they married within their own tribe. This research shows her statement is true of her own family, too. Her parents married in New York City, but they came from the same beautiful town in the spur of the Italian boot.