Stop and Admire Your Family Tree Milestones

On Saturday I made my backup files and closed down Family Tree Maker a couple of hours early. Why would I do such a thing? Because I reached a big milestone. I wanted to savor it a while before moving on to the next one.

How many milestones have you reached in your genealogy research? Think back to when you started building your family tree. How much did you know?

These types of genealogy victories are important milestones in your family tree journey.

I grew up knowing the names of my eight great grandparents. That's a great start! I'd met only two of them, and I was too young to remember it. Only four of them had emigrated to the United States; the other four stayed in Italy. But I never realized I didn't know one great grandmother's maiden name until 2003 when my aunt said it was Caruso. That was the year I began building my tree.

And that's when I started reaching family tree milestones.

Milestone 1: Locating Ancestors' Place of Origin

My ancestors arrived in America in 1898. First two of my 2nd great grandparents came. A year later, two of my great grandparents came, pregnant with Grandma.

Grandma's last living sibling told me her family came from Avellino and Pastene. That was only a clue in my genealogy trail. You see, Avellino is both a city and a province in Italy. So where did they come from? And Pastene, well, I was hearing it as Pastena, and I headed off in the wrong direction for a while.

Then I found my people. An 1898 ship manifest said my 2nd great grandparents came from Sant'Angelo a Cupolo. It used an abbreviation of the town, but when I found it on the map, I saw a section of that town called Pastene. At last I was on the right track. Grandma's family came from the Pastene in Sant'Angelo a Cupolo, Benevento, Italy.

Figuring out who came from Avellino—and where—took a few more years. But I did it.

Milestone 2: Finding Documents from Another Country

I spent a few years at Family History Centers viewing microfilmed vital records. I viewed only my maternal grandfather Adamo's hometown, Baselice. I knew next to nothing about his family. I had his parents' names and those of two of his siblings.

Once I located Adamo's mother's birth record in 1856, and his father's in 1850, I was ready to start climbing that tree. Soon I realized I should document everyone in this small town's records. Otherwise I wouldn't know who was related to whom. Too many people had the same name. By 2012, I'd added more than 15,000 people from Baselice to my family tree.

Today this is much easier because these records are available online. All my ancestors came from small, neighboring towns with tons of intermarriage. That's why my family tree has 86,957 people today. And there will be many more.

Milestone 3: Breaking Down a Brick Wall

So who came from Avellino and where? It had to be someone on my maternal grandmother's branch, but it wasn't her parents. The answer came from Grandma's uncle's World War I draft registration card. He said he was born in Tufo, Avellino. I rushed off to a Family History Center and by sheer coincidence, they had a reel of microfilm for the town of Tufo. Someone else had ordered it, so I got to view it.

I found Grandma's uncle's birth record, and those of two of his siblings who died young. No one in my living family knew about these children. Grandma's parents were from Pastene. Did her grandmother Colomba come from Tufo? I couldn't find her there.

But I kept on pushing. I found Colomba's brothers living in Tufo. They had children there. But at least one of these documents told me Colomba's brothers weren't born in Tufo. They came from the neighboring town of Santa Paolina, Avellino.

At long last, I found Antonio and Colomba's 1871 marriage record in Santa Paolina. This confirmed that Antonio was born in Pastene and Colomba was born in Santa Paolina. Open up the floodgates!

Milestone 4: Making Quality Source Citations

That brings me to Saturday's milestone. For two years I've been revisiting Italian documents online to create source citations. I used Family Tree Analyzer to export a list of something like 70,000 people in my tree with zero source citations. The horror!

I worked my way through one location at a time, picking off the smaller ones first. On Saturday I finished citing sources for everyone in my family tree from Santa Paolina! That leaves a handful of unsourced people from the USA, England, Ireland, Canada, and Japan. I give them another try once in a while.

But the frightening bulk of what's left are people from two of my Italian towns. From Pesco Sannita, I have a whopping 9,646 people to cite. And, saving the scariest for last, from Baselice, I have 18,594 people to cite.

Let me explain. Those Baselice people came from the microfilm I was viewing way back when. So I cited the microfilm numbers. But guess what? You can't get microfilm anymore. So I threw out those source citations leaving 18,594 people with nothing to show for themselves.

Also, Using Shortcuts!

The good news is, I keep finding ways to be more efficient in this source citation project. I completed Santa Paolina ahead of schedule because of a couple of tricks I put into use toward the end. I can't wait to work on the next town with these new tricks up my sleeve.

Let me share one that's been a huge time saver for me. I'm working with the Italian records on the Antenati Portal. There's a separate collection (a separate web page) for each available year's:

• birth records
• death records
• marriage records
• marriage banns
• extra marriage records—the fabled "wedding packets"

Instead of opening tons of tabs in my web browser, or re-opening a collection I used before, I'm using a new trick. It's a Firefox browser feature—I don't know which other browsers have this. Firefox lets you drag one tab onto another to create a tab group. You can name that group, save that group, expand and collapse that group. Tomorrow you can open all your groups again in a flash.

I created eight tab groups for Santa Paolina death records. I made one group for each decade from the 1810s through the 1880s. Within each group, I arranged the tabs in order. The 1820s group has tabs for 1820, 1821, 1822, 1823, etc. Now it's much faster to locate a particular person's death record and cite the source. Each page is ready and waiting in memory.

My plan is to create similar groups for my 9,646 Pesco Sannita people right from the start.

How About Your Milestones?

What other milestones have you reached or are you trying to reach?

• Are you putting together binders or charts to share with family? I made 40 copies of a large chart to share with my Sarracino/Saviano cousins many years ago. That created quite the buzz.
• Are you separating truth from myth? My sons' 2nd great grandfather was NOT the brother of the captain of the Titanic. The captain didn't even have brothers!
• Are you gathering documents for membership to the DAR or for dual citizenship? I don't qualify for any of that. I'm descended from peasants.
• Are you writing a book or detailed paper about a particular ancestor? I've done a bit of that, and even worked on my own life story. It's a lot of fun to track down all your past addresses, schools, and jobs.

Be sure to celebrate your family tree milestones. You can share your news with friends and family and even on social media. Or go ahead and take the rest of the day off. Cheers to you, intrepid genealogy researcher!

This Filter Makes DNA Matches Easier to Place

September is half over, and it's time I tackled this month's task from my 2026 Genealogy Calendar. It's a simple goal: Solve more DNA matches.

I manage 4 AncestryDNA tests for my parents, my husband, and myself. Looking at Ancestry, I realized there's a DNA match filter I haven't been using. I can filter the list of matches for any of these tests to include only those with a common ancestor.

The common ancestor label means the match and the test-taker share the same ancestor. That's such a time-saver!

Filter Your List

To start, I went to my mom's list of DNA matches and filtered it to show only those with a common ancestor. As I scrolled through the list of nearly 100 people, I could see I've figured out many of them. I always add a note to a DNA match when I've solve their identity, and those notes are visible in this list.

The first match I see without a note is a potential half 3rd cousin or a 3rd cousin twice removed. The common ancestors are Emanuele Ricciardelli and Giovanna Consolazio. They are my 5th great grandparents (mom's 6th).

It's interesting that Emanuele and Giovanna aren't in this match's family tree. Ancestry must be figuring out the connection using other means. On her Italian side, this DNA match's tree ends at her grandfather. And his last name is not in my family tree.

Looking at this one type of DNA match led to a huge branch of my family tree.

Look for a Connection

Using this DNA match's family tree as a launch pad, I searched for records for this man with the Italian last name. (Note: My ancestors are 100% Italian, so I need to follow an Italian branch.)

I found his 1917 New York City marriage certificate. I'm so grateful for the online records of the New York City Municipal Archives. And guess what? His mother Carolina, whose last name is familiar, is in my family tree! Thanks to her son's marriage record, I now know who Carolina married. And this document tells me she gave birth to a son in Orange, New Jersey.

I checked my tree to see that Carolina's great grandparents are—can you guess?—Emanuele Ricciardelli and Giovanna Consolazio. Then I turned to my handy relationship calculator spreadsheet. To find my relationship to Carolina, I went to column "I" (my 5th great grandparents) row 8 (Carolina's great grandparents). She is my 2nd cousin 4 times removed. This DNA match is 3 generations down from Carolina, so I went down 3 rows in the relationship calculator. That shows this DNA match is my 5th cousin once removed, and my mom's 5th cousin.

Here's what's curious. AncestryDNA says this match and mom share 33 cMs. It predicts the relationship is in the 3rd cousin range. But I went to the Shared cM Project Tool found on the DNA Painter website. I entered 33 as the total number of cMs shared. The result? This tool found a 53% chance mom and her match were no closer than 5th cousins.

In this case, it pays to use all the tools available to you.

I added a note to this DNA match. I marked her as mom's 5C through Emanuele Ricciardelli and Giovanna Consolazio. Now I've got more research to do! I learned who my cousin Carolina married, but he isn't from her town in Italy. I discovered their 1881 marriage record in Italy and found birth records for four of their children. One of those children appears to be the groom from the NYC marriage certificate. The NYC certificate says he was born in Orange, New Jersey, in 1893, but I have his 1893 birth record from Santa Paolina, Italy. I'll keep searching, but so far the 1910 census confirms that the groom was born in Italy.

I'm so lucky to have a ton of Italian vital records available online through the Antenati portal. Without them, my family tree would end at the great grandparent level. How disappointing that would be! Still, the Italian records create many dead ends. Using DNA matches, I can discover who came emigrated and continue documenting branches.

Try Another Avenue

I'll bet some of you are saying, "Why not use Ancestry's ThruLines® to find this relationship?" That did occur to me, and this solved DNA match is there. But the amount of digging it took to find her was ridiculous. I had to keep consulting my family tree. First I worked my way up to Emanuele Ricciardelli and Giovanna Consolazio. Then I had to look at my tree to see that I want the descendants of their son Samuele. And then I want the descendants of his daughter Anna. Once I followed those branches, I did find this DNA match as well as her brother. I didn't even know her brother was in my or mom's DNA match list.

Now that I have drilled down to this level in ThruLines, I see many more DNA matches I need to explore. I should have started doing this earlier in the month!

Have you tried Ancestry's common ancestor filter before? I'm always happy to see "common ancestor" in the match list, but somehow I never realized it was a filter until today.

Create Your Customized Genealogy Research Guide

I first wrote about using a genealogy Document Tracker in January 2017. It's an efficient way to track your progress and guide your research. At a glance, it shows which documents you have and which you're missing for each person. But I haven't mentioned it in a long time.

Why? It became impractical when my family tree got too big. Today my tree has 86,566 people. About 83,000 of those people lived and died in Italy. I'm lucky to have access to many of their birth, marriage, and death records, but I can't expect to get anything else.

Filter the List As Needed

If I can reduce that list to people were in the United States, I know there will be documents to gather. Here's how I can filter my list of people to show only those with a birth, marriage, or death in the United States.

• Each day I work on my family tree in Family Tree Maker, I export a GEDCOM file. I opened the latest GEDCOM in Family Tree Analyzer.
• I clicked the Export menu and chose Individuals to Excel. This created a spreadsheet I saved to my desktop.
• After converting the file from CSV format to Excel format, I deleted many of the columns, leaving only:
  • Surname
  • Forenames
  • BirthDate
  • BirthLocation
  • DeathLocation
  • MarriageLocation
• I went to the Data menu in Excel. I filtered the spreadsheet to show birth locations that included "United States". This hid all the other lines. I selected the visible rows and gave them a yellow color.
• I removed that filter and showed death locations that included "United States". Many of these lines were already yellow because the person was born in the U.S., but I made them all yellow.
• Once more, I removed that filter and made a new one. This one showed marriage locations that included "United States". I made them yellow and removed the filter.

Here's how you can create a genealogy research guide that's custom-made for your family tree.

When I sorted the spreadsheet to show only the yellow cells, I had a list of 3,034 people who had been in the United States. Yes, there will be some people that this process misses. I expect to discover them as I work to fill in in the spreadsheet.

Here are my past articles on the document tracker:

• Haven't I Seen You Before?
• Track Your Genealogy Finds and Your Searches
• How to Make Your Genealogy Research More Complete
• Why Use a Genealogy Document Tracker?
• Which Genealogy Documents Are You Missing?

Populate the New Document Tracker

To create my new, ready-to-use document tracker:

• I downloaded the master document tracker file I keep online to share with my readers. (Make yourself a copy of it. Don't request Edit permission as this is the master file. Make your own copy and edit that.)
• I deleted a couple of columns I don't want to track (baptism and burial).
• In my filtered spreadsheet, I sorted the results by last name, then first name. I displayed only the yellow cells.
• I copied the last name, first name, and birth date of these lines and pasted them into my new document tracker. The birth date is important because way too many people have the same name.

Salvage Past Efforts

I spent a ton of time on my old document tracker before abandoning it in late 2018. So I want to salvage the old file's contents. I opened the old and the new spreadsheets side by side. Now I can copy the pertinent tracking information from the old file to the new. Yikes. This is gonna take a while.

My passion project for the past two years has been creating my missing source citations. That's still my top priority. But when I do spend time working on people from my tree who lived in the U.S., I will consult and update my document tracker.

If you have access to a decent amount of records from your country, consider using a document tracker. With your document tracker, you can make your in-country research as complete as possible.

Why Did Your Immigrant Ancestors Leave Home?

In January I mapped out 12 small genealogy projects to add to this year's calendar. They're all projects I've wanted to complete, but I never seemed to make time for them. This plan has been worthwhile and productive, so I want to make sure I map out 12 projects every year.

My project for August was "Look into local social conditions". I wanted to find out what was happening in Italy when my immigrant ancestors left home forever.

Those precious vital records in your family tree can't tell you what your ancestor's life was like. This tool can.

I don't have a lot of immigrant ancestors since my roots in my home country are not very deep. I have:

• Two 2nd great grandparents who left Italy for New York in 1898.
• Four great grandparents who left Italy for New York in 1899, 1902, and 1906.
• Two grandfathers who left Italy for New York in 1920.

Based on these eight immigrants, I started a chat with Microsoft Copilot. After answering my questions, Copilot suggested follow-up questions that I pursued.

What Was Going On in 1920?

I asked, "What were the social conditions in the Benevento province of Italy when my grandfather emigrated to New York in November 1920?"

When I visited my ancestral hometowns, I fell in love with them. I wondered how my ancestors could ever want to leave. I've since learned that poverty in Southern Italy was a strong driving force. This chat (which cited its sources) told me about three dominant forces in the area at the time:

1. The political climate left Southern Italy with no opportunities for growth and modernization. These were farming communities, and only the wealthy owned land. That wasn't about to change. In 1919 and 1920 there was unrest over these conditions. There were strikes and social agitation that often ended in violence.
2. The economy in the south took a beating due to post-World War I inflation and unemployment. There were no opportunities for either of my grandfathers.
3. My grandfathers may have felt an obligation to provide for their families. They couldn't do that if they stayed home and worked the land.

It's also worth noting that the Spanish flu lasted from 1918–1920. This caused further hardship and increased the conditions of poverty.

What About Earlier Years?

Next I thought about my maternal great grandparents. I asked, "Were the social conditions any different in 1898 and 1899 in nearby Sant'Angelo a Cupolo, Benevento?"

The answer surprised me. Things were much worse at that time. In 1898 there was rioting over food insecurity. It was a nationwide crisis, but it hit much harder in Southern Italy. It started with a bad wheat harvest and skyrocketing grain prices. Protests in cities as close as Napoli ended with shootings and military intervention.

This was the year my 2nd great grandfather took his whole family to New York. Well, he did leave behind one daughter. She and my great grandfather followed in 1899 after marrying, having a baby, and losing that baby.

And In-Between Years?

My paternal great grandparents didn't meet until they came to America. I asked about my great grandmother's town when she left in 1906. "What was happening in Pescolamazza, Benevento, when my great grandmother emigrated in 1906, following several of her brothers?"

It seems that in 1906, as in 1898 and 1920, poverty was a major factor. Poor people like my ancestors didn't own the land they worked. Their situation sounds like that of the sharecroppers in the U.S. South. They never earned enough money to pay their debts and lived in a state of extreme poverty.

My great grandmother was the last of her siblings to come to New York. It's possible her parents were dead by 1906. Her brothers sent for her in upstate New York. Within four months, she married their friend and paesan, my great grandfather.

As suggested by Copilot, I asked about the daily routine of people in Pescolamazza in 1906. All my ancestors came from rural hill towns, located close together. So the description would fit them all.

Copilot gave me a detailed itinerary of a family's typical day. This includes what they ate, where they worked, and how they interacted with the community. It was a demanding life. I can appreciate how much easier it seemed to them once they came to America. They still worked hard, but they were able to thrive.

I copied the conversation into a Word document to save. I titled it "Southern Italian Social Conditions & Emigration". I'll follow up by chatting about living in a tenement building in the Bronx, New York, in the early 1900s.

What would you like to learn about your ancestors' lives and motivation?

---

There was one month's project this year that was a bust—but I still plan to make it happen. I wanted to find more documents to digitize using HandwritingOCR, but I couldn't come up with any! I'd already digitized:

• my handwritten notebook of ship manifests
• a few books about my ancestral hometowns
• my brother's college paper documenting our family history.

I couldn't think of anything else.

Then I had an idea. What about my college thesis (a novel)? I can't seem to find it, but I have a few other items I'd love to turn into Word documents. There are my notebooks from when I was a college film student and two short novels I wrote after college. I'd love to recover these works through digitization.

Which projects have you had on the back burner for ages? What if you scheduled time for a couple of them? What's stopping you?

Adding GPS Coordinates to Your Family Tree

Entering an address into Google Maps and Bing Maps can show you two very different locations. In most of these cases, Google can't find the place and shows the same-named street in another city.

In a past article I explained why I prefer to use Bing Maps to locate streets in my ancestors' Italian towns. The other day I was looking at one town with a very dense cluster of buildings. I knew there had to be alleys running between all the buildings. How else would someone walk around? Google Maps showed no street or alley names in the cluster. Bing Maps showed a ton.

But I love using Google Street View to see what it looks like to stand where my ancestors stood. It's rare that Bing Maps lets me click to see the view from the street. This is why I often search both map sites side by side.

Why Latitude and Longitude Coordinates Matter

Here's what made me want to add coordinates to my family tree. There are too many cases where I look at a location in the Places tab of Family Tree Maker, and it's wrong. The map isn't showing the address I entered. It's doing what Google Maps sometimes does—showing me a similar street name in another town. Which is weird because Family Tree Maker uses Bing Maps as its database.

Seek out the missing and incorrect GPS coordinates in your family tree with this free tool.

I want to return to my ancestral hometowns in Italy. There are places I still want to see—and a couple of hometowns I've never visited. When I get there, it would be fantastic to pull out my iPhone and know exactly where to go. I don't want to risk getting there and finding an error in the FTM map.

See What You Have and What You're Missing

My family tree has been growing again as I work through missing source citations and add more facts. My tree now has 86,188 people, and the vast majority are from small towns in Italy. My tree includes 10,269 places. Family Tree Analyzer shows you the places in your tree that have latitude and longitude coordinates.

To see which locations in your tree have coordinates and which ones need them:

• Open your GEDCOM file in Family Tree Analyzer.
• Click the Locations tab. This puts you on the Tree View tab in the second row of tabs.
• Click the Places tab that's on the same level as Tree View. It's the last one on the right.

You will see different icons:

• A blue question mark means you need more information. I have soldiers who died in Ethiopia and Armenia. The map in Family Tree Maker is showing the right place, but Family Tree Analyzer marks them as Not Searched. I will add GPS coordinates in Family Tree Maker so they'll be in my next GEDCOM export.
• A green check mark means the place is on the map and shouldn't need any attention. In the Locations/Countries tab, you'll see the coordinates and a Geocode Status of Google Matched.
• A white check mark inside a green circle means GPS coordinates are in place. You should see the coordinates there in the table.

You will have places showing a blue question mark that don't need anything from you. Why? Because they don't have any facts attached to them. For instance, a man in my family tree was born in Coleman, Crowsnest Pass, Alberta, Canada. I have GPS coordinates for Coleman. But Crowsnest Pass and Alberta have no facts, so they need no coordinates.

There may be other blue question marks you can't resolve. In my tree, an Italian soldier died in Kosovo, and I know the name of the town. But Serbia doesn't recognize the independence of the Republic of Kosovo. So the map in Family Tree Maker doesn't know what to do with it. That's above my pay-grade, so I'll leave it alone. I have another type of problem with a soldier who died in Libya. I have a town name, but I can't locate the town or its state on the map for certain.

Work Through the Project

In Family Tree Analyzer, click the Export menu at the top of the window and select Locations to Excel. Then sort the spreadsheet by the Geocoded column. Doing this, I see:

• 1,374 locations with latitude and longitude coordinates (way more than I expected).
• 774 Google Matched locations that show coordinates in Family Tree Analyzer. I plan to check a bunch of them to make sure Family Tree Maker is showing the right place. If not, I'll add the coordinates.
• 8,198 locations with no coordinates. They say they are Not Searched. The first one I checked looks correct in Family Tree Maker, so I'm hoping most of them are fine. I'm an optimist.
• 121 locations marked as Partial Match. There are different kinds of partial matches:
  • 73 Partial Match (Google)
  • 30 Partial Match (Levels)
  • 18 Partial Match (Ord Surv)

I didn't find a definition of the three types of Partial Match, but I checked a few against Google Maps. They seem fine. In a few cases, the address no longer exists. For instance, my parents' first home is now the site of a sports arena, so the best I can do is estimate the spot. (I found a map from the right year, but it ends a short distance before the sport arena.) If I add coordinates to Family Tree Maker, I should be able to clear up all the partial matches.

Copy and Paste the Coordinates

To copy and paste the coordinates into your family tree:

• Pinpoint the location you want in Google Maps or Bing Maps.
• Right-click at that location to reveal numbers that look something like this: 30.56951350255699, 49.039306549833455.
• Click those numbers to copy them. You can paste them in the Location field found on the Places tab in Family Tree Maker. See what the best spot is for these numbers in your family tree software.

When I don't have a specific address, I do the best I can. I put my mouse in the approximate center of the town, state, or country and right-click for coordinates.

Important! GPS coordinates in the Places/Location field are not available outside of Family Tree Maker. You can't get to them from your tree on Ancestry or in the Ancestry app.

You can make your GPS coordinates accessible from your smartphone with a feature of Family Tree Analyzer. Do this after you've entered all the coordinates you want. Here's how:

• From the Maps menu, choose Export to Google MyMaps. This will save a *.kml file to your computer.
• Go to Google Maps and click the Saved tab, then the Maps tab.
• At the bottom of the window, click CREATE MAP.
• Click Create.
• Click Untitled map to give your map name and description.
• Click Import and upload your *.kml file.

With this custom Google Map, you can use your smartphone to navigate to any location in your family tree! Open the Google Maps app and tap You at the bottom of the screen. Scroll way down and tap Maps (it's next to Timeline). Your new custom map will be there, ready to use.

One Question Leads to Rich Family Tree History

In January I committed to working on 12 genealogy projects in 2026. Before this year, I put off these projects because my source citations project takes up all my time. But each one is something I want to work on; something I want to complete. Putting them on the calendar makes me commit a bit of time to each project. And I have finished some of them 100 percent.

This month's task is "Find new details in family photos". A year ago I used Microsoft Copilot to analyze a few old photos. AI can identify time and place using clothing style, automobiles, landmarks, and more.

Choose a Mysterious Photo

I looked through my Family Tree/photos folder. I found a portrait of my first cousin five times removed, Francesco Saverio Basile, born in 1832. I have his portrait because he was infamous. He was a brigand. Definition? A member of a gang that ambushes and robs people in forests and mountains.

See how you can take a mysterious photo from your family tree and turn it into a rich piece of history.

But he wasn't hiding beside the road robbing wealthy passersby like Robin Hood. He was part of a large group of Southern Italian men who used violence to oppose the 1861 unification of Italy.

Copilot's Analysis

I dropped his portrait into Copilot and asked one question. "What can you tell me about this photo of Francesco Saverio Basile? He was born in Colle Sannita, Benevento, Italy in 1832. In 1861 he was killed by the Piedmontese Army as a brigand."

Whenever you use AI to learn about something, follow the sources. What you'll see is a helpful summary, but follow the sources to learn more.

Copilot confirmed this is a mid-19th-century Italian studio portrait. It pointed me to a website that talks about Francesco Saverio Basile. His nickname was Pilorusso because of his red hair. (I know that is true.) Based in a forest, he led guerilla actions against the new Italian authorities in 1861.

I knew about Pilorusso because a man from my grandfather's hometown wrote a book on the brigands in 2022. When I saw a post about Francesco by this author, Antonio Bianco, I used vital records to see if I have a connection to this man. And I do.

The best source Copilot showed me happens to be an essay written by Antonio Bianco. Reading the essay led me to ask Copilot several follow-up questions. Here's the gist of what I learned as background to this one photograph.

• I knew Napoleon's rule is the reason we have civil records for Italy from about 1809 to 1815. Now I've learned that Napoleon put his brother and then his brother-in-law on the throne in Naples. He must have been busy conquering elsewhere.
• After Napoleon's defeat, things changed. The House of Bourbon (aka the French) ruled the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies from 1816 to 1860. Italy at the time consisted of a few kingdoms, states, and duchies, many under foreign rule.
• This part's a real surprise. The Bourbons' investments made the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies prosperous before unification. I'm surprised because I know the south was not prosperous after unification.
• A pie chart shows that before the 1861 unification of Italy, the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies held 66% of Italy's wealth. This explains why a band of rebels, or brigands, were so opposed to unification and loyal to the Bourbons.
• My cousin Francesco led a series of assaults on local institutions, based in his hideout in a forest.
• The governor of Benevento asked for help, and the military set out to destroy the brigands. By late 1861, my cousin is missing. Historians say the military captured and shot him.
• Another man, Michele Caruso, becomes the leader of the brigands after Francesco's death. His second in command, Antonio Secola, is also in my family tree. They captured and shot Caruso in 1863. Secola surrendered in June 1864.
• I can add to my family tree that Antonio Secola died in prison on the island of Elba in 21 Apr 1885. (I created a source citation for Antonio Bianco's essay and the website.) More research helped me find the prison. It's in what is now a beautiful resort town with stunning views of the Tyrrhenian Sea.

As a test, I tried the same exercise on three other AI platforms.

1. Claude AI

Claude AI impressed me. Here's what it did with the photo and a brief statement:

• It provided a summary of facts, citing another article by Antonio Bianco as its source.
• It led me to another source that says the military executed Francesco by a firing squad. This source contains photographs and paintings depicting the lives of the brigands.
• Claude pointed me to a Wikipedia page that says Francesco was a former officer of the Bourbon Army.

As a follow-up question, I asked for details about Antonio Secola. I learned his marriage date, which is great because it is not found in the 1856 marriages for his hometown. His marriage banns are available, but not the marriage. Antonio's story has some fascinating tidbits. For instance, he went to jail for theft, but since he had helped build the courthouse, he managed to escape. He went home for three years!

2. NotebookLM

Using NotebookLM, I uploaded the portrait and got a response before asking anything. The photo's metadata identifies him as Francesco Saverio Basile. NotebookLM provided a very detailed description of the man and his clothing. It dated the photo in the mid-to-late 19th century.

I added the note I have with Francesco in my family tree. It says: Francesco Saverio Basile was a "briganti" known as Pelorosso (Pilèrusscè in dialect) because he had red hair. At dawn on 10 August 1861, the Piedmontese Army broke up his band of brigands, consisting of about 1,000 men. He may have died on that date.

As a response, NotebookLM:

• went into even more detail about his facial hair
• said his clothing is consistent with the rural brigand style of the mid-19th century in the Italian south
• said, "His ability to lead a band of 1,000 men highlights his significant role during the period of social and political upheaval following the unification of Italy. This image serves as a rare visual record of a figure who participated in the intense resistance against the new Italian state."

It didn't cite any sources, which isn't helpful, but it suggested follow-up questions.

3. ChatGPT

The only other time I tried ChatGPT I hated it. It made up everything. This time I got more details about Francesco Saverio Basile's historical context. It mentions that brigands could be:

1. former soldiers of the Army of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies (which I now know is Francesco's case)
2. supporters of the deposed House of Bourbon-Two Sicilies
3. peasants resisting new taxes or conscription
4. local outlaws
5. people motivated by political, economic, and personal reasons.

Every analysis of his portrait mentions his tilted hat. It seems wearing it that way was typical of rural southern Italians at the time. That's an amazing little detail I wouldn't have suspected.

Your Turn

Time to go through your family tree photo collection. Which ones hold mysteries for you? Are there any where clothing styles or automobiles may help narrow down the time and place? You owe it to yourself to see what you can learn.

How to Find and Fix Family Tree Inconsistencies

As I continue adding the missing source citations to my family tree, there's a nice side-effect. I get to review how I've recorded people's facts.

There's one type of fact I want to fix, but I need to be able to see the big picture first. Most of the 85,000+ people in my family tree lived in Italy. Between about 1815 and 1865, their birth record can include their baptism details.

I always record the baptism when it's available. But I didn't always put in the name and address of the church. I didn't think of it until I visited some of those Italian churches. I need a way to find all the baptism facts in my tree that are missing the church's name and address.

How can you find everyone in your family tree with inconsistent details? It's easy!

Family Tree Analyzer makes it very easy to get the big picture I need. I opened my latest GEDCOM file in FTA and clicked the Facts tab. I selected only the Baptism fact and all the relationship types. Then I clicked the button with wording that seems confusing*, but it's the right one. It says, "Show only the selected Facts for Individuals who don't have any of the excluded Fact Types".

*The button's wording confused me because I wasn't excluding any Fact Types.

This opened a new window with the results. I have 24,910 people with a baptism fact in my family tree. Since that's such a long list, I exported the results to a spreadsheet. Then I sorted the spreadsheet by the Location column. Now it's easy to see the locations that are town names, not church names.

Here's an example of what I see. Ten people have a baptism location of Apice (Apice, Benevento, Campania, Italy). A few other people have the full address of the church of San Nicola in Apice. A ton more use the church of Santa Maria Assunta in Apice. I need to:

• revisit the birth records of those 10 people
• see if their baptism happened in San Nicola or Santa Maria Assunta
• fix the address.

Why You'd Want to Do This

This exercise is all about consistency and thoroughness. I've been preaching consistency ever since I began this blog in 2017. That's because doing a task with consistency adds quality to the results. And if your family tree is important to you, you'll want its quality level to be high.

Never overlook consistency:

• Make Consistency King in Your Family Tree
• How to Batch Process Your Genealogy Documents
• Organize Your Genealogy Research By Choosing Your Style

To begin, I'm deleting the spreadsheet lines with duplicate church addresses. Instead of 100 lines showing me the location of the church in Pietrelcina, Italy, I'll keep only one line. This will be my reference for any Pietrelcina baptisms that don't name the church. I have 12 of those, so I'll go to each of them in my family tree and make the correction.

With the duplicate church names removed, my spreadsheet has 6,484 lines. Several are references to remind me of the church name in that town. I see that a TON of lines are from four towns whose source citations I haven't added yet. I'll be working on them soon.

Like every other big project I do, I'll chip away at the smaller groups of people first. I'll pick off the 10 from Apice, the five from Alberona, the 13 from Pago Veiano, and so on.

The first town I addressed is the one whose source citations I completed on Friday. It's called Sant'Angelo a Cupolo, and it's a bit sprawled out. While the population is small, the town has a bunch of hamlets, each with its own church. The spreadsheet showed me that I didn't have a street address for two of the churches I've been entering. I used Google Maps to see exactly where they are and made all my updates.

Next I need to find all the marriages that are missing the name and address of the church!

Need Another Option?

If you don't want to use Family Tree Analyzer, you have a few software options. These include:

• Family Historian (this is the best alternative option)
• Gramps (I didn't find an export-to-spreadsheet option)
• RootsMagic (not the free version, as far as I can tell)
• Legacy Family Tree
• Reunion

Think about your family tree. Is there a type of fact you're better at recording now than you were at first? Wouldn't you like to get it right? Export a spreadsheet and tease out the inconsistencies you'd like to fix.

The Ancestor Map of My Dreams for Free

Two weeks ago I searched for a website that would show all my ancestors plotted on a map. The best I found was a site called Genomelink with its Your Roots Map feature. But I wasn't satisfied with it at all.

On Saturday I found everything I wanted and much more. TreeLab is a free GEDCOM analyzer with extraordinary mapping features. Much like GEDminer, which I reviewed in March, TreeLab does a deep analysis of your family tree. And it does so in a split second! There's so much to explore with TreeLab, but let's focus on the mapping features today.

Using the TreeLab Maps

First drop your GEDCOM file onto the main TreeLab page. You aren't uploading it anywhere. The analysis takes place in the web browser on your computer in the blink of an eye. (Once again I'm in awe of computer programmers.) Click the Maps tab and then the Ancestor Map button. Identify yourself or whomever you want to analyze. I chose "showing up to 15G" because I could see at the bottom of the page that this plotted all my direct ancestors.

My quest to find the ancestor map I've been dreaming of is finally fulfilled.

The map shows my 4 U.S. ancestors (my parents and grandmothers) and my 413 Italian ancestors. Click the Filters button above the map to understand the colors. Different colored dots on the map tell you the level of ancestor. For example, 6th great grandparents have a purple dot. Larger dots mean more people. For example, one large dot on the town of Colle Sannita represents 132 of my ancestors. Hover over any dot for details. Click the dot for far more detail.

I love this visual. It's everything I hoped to find in my search two weeks ago.

Identifying Missing Places

Here's a project I need to do, and TreeLab is a great tool to help get it done. I have too many people in my family tree with no birth or death location. If you're going to analyze your GEDCOM, it helps to put everyone somewhere on the map.

I've been putting at least the country in blank locations as I come across them. But I have close to 9,000 more people like this. TreeLab to the rescue!

This free surname map is a tremendous genealogy tool.

When I click the Maps tab and the Surname Map button in TreeLab, I see the most common last names from my family tree. Each name shows how many people in my tree have that name. When I click my maiden name, Iamarino, I see all 816 people plotted on a world map. When I scroll below the map, there's a full list of 816 people in chronological order by birth. The details include each person's:

• full name
• year born
• year died
• birth place

This list makes it easy to see who has no birth place recorded at all. They're the ones I want to fix. You can click the Excel button at the top of the list to export these facts to a spreadsheet. When I do so, the Excel file also includes each person's sex and death place.

If your tree doesn't have 85,664 people, you can view these lists without downloading anything. My list of 396 people with the surname Gentile has only 5 people with no birth place. I can correct them without a download.

When I do download a surname, I can filter the spreadsheet to show everyone with an empty birth place.

Note: On TreeLab's Research tab, when I click Research Gaps I see that 77,408 out of 85,664 of my people have a birth place. That means 8,256 people need my attention. My score on death places is much worse.

Why This Matters

In 2008 I learned I could view Italian vital records on microfilm at a Family History Center. Four years later, before these records came online, I added 15,000 people to my family tree. And they all came from ONE TOWN—Baselice. (Here's what that process looked like.)

At the time, I didn't want to assume everyone was born in Baselice. I didn't even want to assume they were born in Italy! Now I know better, and I want my family tree to have better data.

Here's a good example. My 3rd great grandfather, Giuseppe Leone, died in Baselice in 1830. His death record names his parents and says he was born in Baselice. But when I entered his parents into my tree, I left their birth locations blank. After documenting thousands of 19th century Italians, I know they stayed put. No one came to those tiny, remote towns from another country.

Plus, I realized two important facts about Italian death records:

1. When the death record names the deceased's parents, it often says they were "conjugi di detto Terra". That means they were "spouses of the same town". Well, if they married in Baselice, and their child died in Baselice, it's safe to say that child was born in Baselice.
2. If someone died in the town but came from another town, the death record mentions their original town. More modern death records that have a placeholder for the deceased's birth place. On earlier records, it's common to state where the person came from.
   
   Here's an example. My 7th great grandfather's 1749 death record calls him "Domenico Mascia di Campolattaro". Domenico Mascia died in Colle Sannita, Italy, and had seven children there. But his death record states he came from the town of Campolattaro, about 11 miles away.

I'm going to pay extra attention to my direct ancestors who are missing places or using "Italy". A review of their documents may have clues I missed before.

For lots more help with understanding Italian death records, see How to Read an Italian Death Record REVISED.

Let me know if you agree TreeLab has more to offer than GEDminer. I plan to write about TreeLab's other features soon.

4 Steps to Make Your Digital Photos More Valuable

In January I wrote about "12 Genealogy Projects to Put on the Calendar". I'm tackling each job in turn, and I'm so glad to get them done. I rearranged a few of the months, and I had to change one project.

That project was to "Digitize more pages" using HandwritingOCR. It turns your document images into text files. I've done this with a few books written in different languages:

• I photographed the pages with my iPhone or scanner.
• I converted them into text with HandwritingOCR, saving the result in a text file.
• I translated the text with Google Translate, saving that result in the same text file.

But I have nothing left to digitize. So I changed my May 2026 task to "Download and categorize my Google Photos". I hadn't done that since March 2023!

Take these 4 steps to add tons of value to photos and genealogy document images.

Years ago my iPhone ran out of room to store new photos. I'd heard about Google Photos and started using it in 2013. A free account gives you 15 GB of storage, and 13 years of my photos take up one third of that. Since Google Photos is always backing up my photos for me, I can remove them from my iPhone if I want. My current phone has plenty of storage, but I'd rather streamline what's on there.

Keep in mind, anything you store on Google Photos is accessible via an app on your phone or the website. So all your photos are still portable.

I created several albums on Google Photos and assigned every photo to one of them. My albums have names like House, Woofie, Family, Cars, Maine 2021, and more. Then I went through the albums and downloaded everything newer than March 2023. But there's much more to do.

Let's concentrate on the genealogy-related photos today. I have lots of family photos and old photos sent to me by my cousins in texts:

• A typical downloaded photo saved from a text has a file name like 20200406_171047_1648666454076_001.jpg. You can see it begins with a date, but the rest isn't helpful.
• Other photos have names like IMG_3806.JPG. That's useless other than keeping photos in chronological order.
• Still other photos have names like 2592.heic. HEIC?

I found out HEIC stands for High Efficiency Image Compression. These don't open on my computer the way JPGs do. For me, they launch Photoshop. I downloaded a free HEIC Viewer from the Microsoft Store, but it keeps asking me to rate it. While it can convert the HEIC files to JPGs, that capability isn't free. So I'm going to use Photoshop to do the conversion.

There are four steps we all need to take with our digital photos:

• Rename your photos to something meaningful. I can identify "DiAnn and Chris Summer 1992" a lot easier than "20211215_115628_1639588924940_001.jpg". I'd know which photo it was without seeing a thumbnail.
• Crop and enhance your photos as needed. Some of my photos from texts are screenshots that a cousin sent. I can crop out the surroundings. And if it's an old damaged photo, I can clean it up.
• Give your photos metadata. Metadata is information you enter into the photo's properties. This information stays with the photo file. It can include a title, tags, a comment, date taken, and more.
• File your photos to make finding them more intuitive. Since I categorized my Google Photos into albums, they're already in good folders. But I can make sub-folders. Then I can keep all the family photos from Bella's 2025 graduation party together.

Let's take a look at these four steps.

1. Rename your photos to something meaningful

I have four photos of my husband Paul and my late cousin Carmine, taken at my cousin Paula's birthday party in 2023. They're all in the HEIC format that iPhones use. My first step is to rename them to include the subjects. I'm keeping it simple: Paul Ohama and Carmine Mollica 1, 2, 3, and 4.

2. Crop and enhance your photos as needed

Opening the photos in Photoshop, I see the color is a bit yellow. When I clicked Image > Auto Color for each one, they looked much better. There's unnecessary space above their heads, so I can crop that out.

With these adjustments, I can save each image in JPG format with its new name. I'll delete the HEIC versions, knowing they're still out there on Google Photos.

3. Give your photos metadata

For years I've been adding metadata to my genealogy document images. I give them a title which carries over to Family Tree Maker when I drop them there. And I add comments that include the source citation.

Not long ago I learned something new about metadata from a video by Thomas MacEntee. You can add metadata to several files at once, as long as they're all getting the same metadata. So I will:

• Select these 4 photos
• Right-click and choose Properties
• Click the Details tab
• Fill in a shared title, the tag "family", a comment about where I took the photos, and the date I took the photos.
• Click Apply to save this metadata to all four files at once.

Having added family as a tag, I can now go to Windows File Explorer (or Finder on a Mac), and type tags:family in the search box. The four photos of Paul and Carmine are at the top of the results list. I'm new to using tags, so I'm keeping it simple for now.

4. File your photos to make finding them more intuitive

These are the only photos I took at cousin Paula's birthday party, so I won't put them in a sub-folder. But I have several photos from cousin Bella's graduation party. I'll give them their own sub-folder. Most of those photos are group shots. I can identify key people in the file name, and identify everyone in the Comments section of the metadata.

I have a lot of work to do, and the plan was to complete this project in May! I'll try to plow through the photos in a few long sessions or commit to an hour or two a day. Then it's on to my June 2026 project (I started it yesterday). That project, "Add more war casualties", was my April project until I reshuffled the deck.

Here's what's involved in the war casualties project. I have a spreadsheet of the men from my ancestral Italian hometowns who died in World War I. The province of Benevento has their actual military records online for download. I'll check to see which military records I haven't downloaded yet for men who are in my family tree. Then I'll add the record and its source citation to my tree.

Which family tree projects have you been putting off? Why not jump into one now and get the ball rolling?

5 Efficiency Techniques That Fortify Your Family Tree

With so many responsibilities to juggle, your time is precious. When you do find time to work on your family tree, you don't want to waste a second.

That's why you need to focus on your efficiency. Efficiency helps you get more done in less time. Here are 5 different ways for you to reap the benefits of efficiency in your genealogy work. They boil down to: (a) focusing on one thing at a time and (b) not reinventing the wheel.

Efficiency techniques give you a higher quality product: your family tree.

1: One Task at a Time

When you do find time to work on your family tree, don't waste a second. Make your own version of this task list (see "How to Run Your Genealogy Research Like Clockwork"). Then choose whichever one you're in the mood for and get right to it.

Your task list should include a mixture of things you know you need to do and things you want to do. For more ideas of things to add to your task list, see "Work in Batches to Strengthen Your Family Tree".

2: One Process at a Time

When I find a census page that contains a large family from my family tree, I need to go through a whole process. I have to:

• Download the census sheet image.
• Give it a name that follows my chosen file-naming pattern.
• Crop and enhance the image in Photoshop.
• Add metadata to the image.
• Attach it to the head of household in my family tree and share it with each member of the household.
• Add facts from this census to each member of the family.
• Create a source citation and attach it to all those facts.
• File away the original image, or keep it in my holding pen until file backup day. (See "This 3-Step Backup Routine Protects Your Family Tree".)

Did you realize you're following a process? Does it have a lot of steps? Think them through and make sure nothing got overlooked.

You'll find it's more efficient to complete the entire process in one sitting. Don't go through the steps for the head of household and worry about the rest of the family later. That's so inefficient. Instead, "Get into a Groove to Fortify Your Family Tree".

3: One Record Type at a Time

Last month I completed a task I thought of long ago. I wanted to find images of the ships my ancestors took from the old country to the new one. Somehow I never got around to doing it. Then I made it a priority. I spent part of two days working on nothing but the ship images. Now, after so much procrastination, it's done!

But most days I spend my genealogy time on one thing: Italian vital records. My ongoing project is to add all the missing source citations to my family tree. The bulk of them are citations for the Italian vital records in my tree.

Focusing on that one task makes me very efficient. If you have missing source citations, you'll be more efficient if you tackle one record type at a time. It could be ship manifests, census records, vital records, or anything else you need. To make your source citations shine, see "Add Consistency to Your Source Citations".

4: One Whole Family at a Time

While working on my missing Italian source citations, I've tried different techniques. I needed to see which is most efficient. First of all, it's by far more efficient to work on one town at a time. My missing source citations come from several different towns. By working on one town at a time:

• I save typing. All my source citations are going to use the same town.
• I stay in one section of the Antenati portal (where they keep the vital records). That means I don't have to navigate to another part of the website.
• I avoid picking the wrong town while adding the citation to Family Tree Maker.

But I did try an experiment. I opened the 1812 birth records for this one town. I went through them page-by-page, looking up the people in my family tree. (They're ALL in there.) I added each missing citation to my tree. I did this all the way through the 1819 births. It was nice that I didn't have to do anything in my web browser but turn the page. But I found that I had to move around in my tree so much that I accomplished less in a day.

What's more efficient is to work through an entire family of siblings at a time. There's no moving around in my tree. I can see them all on one screen in Family Tree Maker.

I have a copy of all the vital records on my computer. It's very efficient for me to:

• search for all the siblings at once using their father's name.
• open each set of Antenati records in a new browser tab.
• customize my source citation template for each sibling.

That's how I complete so many in a day. See "How to Become a Genealogy Efficiency Expert".

5: Use Templates

Why waste time retyping something long and complicated from scratch? Let's say you're creating source citations for a specific type of document. You have tons of these documents to cite, and it'd be nice if they all followed the same style.

No problem! Give some thought to how you want these similar citations to look. Then type out and save a template in a text file. I crank out more than 100 source citations a day for my Italian relatives' vital records. I'm sure not going to type each one out in full each time. That's not efficient. Instead, I start from a citation template and make a few changes to match the record. See the Efficiency section of "2 Keys to Tackling a Big Family Tree Project".

I keep a handful of specialized templates in my text file. These ensure consistency while saving time.

Are you using efficiency techniques to maximize your precious genealogy time?