14 July 2026

5 Rules to Use When Family Tree Details Are Missing

Wouldn't it be wonderful if every vital record you needed for your family tree was available to you? My tree passed 86,000 people the other day because so many records are available online. But I'm still left without many key facts.

It's so important to have an estimated year of birth when you don't have a documented birth date. Without that estimate, you might attach 20th-century babies to 18th century parents!

When I first began building my tree, I wasn't sure how to handle these missing facts. What should I type into these fields? I couldn't leave a name field blank, or a birth year blank. I needed to develop some rules to cover key facts that were missing.

These rules became second nature to me. They're automatic. I don't have to leave these important fields blank or enter whatever occurs to me at the moment. Here are my 5 rules to use when you're missing critical information for any person in your family tree.

Blank facts in your family tree can lead to errors. Follow these 5 rules to avoid problems.
You don't have to leave those undocumented facts blank in your family tree. These 5 genealogy rules will help you avoid errors.

Key Fact #1: Missing Last Name

Use _____ (5 underscores) for the last name. Don't give a woman her husband's last name. That isn't her name, and your family tree shows who she married. Repeating her married name can cause confusion…is that her birth name or not?

Plus, using _____ puts all your missing last names at the top of your family tree's index list to nag at you. (Find me! Find me!)

Key Fact #2: Missing First Name

Use _____ (5 underscores) for the first name. Keep scouring other family members' documents. One of them may have the name you're missing.

Key Fact #3: Missing Year of Birth

Depending on the information you have, you can:

  • Match their spouse's year of birth. If you can document their spouse's year of birth, you can assume they were born about the same year—as a placeholder.
  • Subtract 25 from eldest known child's year of birth. I use 25 because that's the average age when most of my people became parents.

But ALWAYS prefix the year with Abt. (the common family tree software abbreviation for about) to show you aren't certain. For example, if their spouse's year of birth is 1850, you'd say they were born Abt. 1850.

Key Fact #4: Missing Year of Death

See if any of their descendants' documents refer to this person as being dead. I see tons of Italian vital records that mention a grandfather, and may say he is dead. For example, an 1868 Italian birth record for Angela can state that her father is Giovanni "fu" Antonio. That "fu" means Angela's father's father, Antonio, died before Angela's date of birth.

If you find this, you can state they died before (abbreviated in family tree software as Bef.) the date of the document that mentions them. You may find a census page where the person is missing and it says their spouse is a widow. Or you may find a vital record that says their parents are dead.

If the resulting date tells you they died before they turned 125 or so, don't bother to record it. It's too obvious. The purpose of a "died before" date is to narrow down your search when new documents become available to you. It will also keep you from adding a child to a dead person.

Key Fact #5: Missing Place of Birth

If you have no place of birth for someone, see where their siblings were born. Of course, if you did this with my immediate family, you'd assume I was born in Virginia like my siblings. You'd be wrong. But that's mid-20th-century, and my family moved a ridiculous number of times.

If you have a good amount of data pointing to a particular state or province, you can use that place for the time being. Add a note or let the lack of a specific location say that you need to find documentation.

If you don't feel comfortable committing to a state or province, at least use the family's country. Take a look at the era. Do some historical research on the country at that time. You may be able to assume the family didn't move around.

Let's say there's a family unit in my tree with 4 out of 5 children born in the same town. But I have no document to tell me the middle child's town of birth. I'd feel safe in assuming the middle child was born in the same town as their surrounding siblings. I wouldn't commit to the same street or house number, but the town? Yes, for sure.

It's very rare for a couple to have babies, leave home, have another baby, and then return home and have more babies. Although I have seen it once or twice, it's very unusual.


What rules do you use to cover missing facts so you can continue building your family tree? Having these placeholders can help you prevent errors and may lead you to the document you need.

07 July 2026

One Question Leads to Rich Family Tree History

In January I committed to working on 12 genealogy projects in 2026. Before this year, I put off these projects because my source citations project takes up all my time. But each one is something I want to work on; something I want to complete. Putting them on the calendar makes me commit a bit of time to each project. And I have finished some of them 100 percent.

This month's task is "Find new details in family photos". A year ago I used Microsoft Copilot to analyze a few old photos. AI can identify time and place using clothing style, automobiles, landmarks, and more.

Choose a Mysterious Photo

I looked through my Family Tree/photos folder. I found a portrait of my first cousin five times removed, Francesco Saverio Basile, born in 1832. I have his portrait because he was infamous. He was a brigand. Definition? A member of a gang that ambushes and robs people in forests and mountains.

An old, undated studio portrait is the perfect subject for AI analysis.
See how you can take a mysterious photo from your family tree and turn it into a rich piece of history.

But he wasn't hiding beside the road robbing wealthy passersby like Robin Hood. He was part of a large group of Southern Italian men who used violence to oppose the 1861 unification of Italy.

Copilot's Analysis

I dropped his portrait into Copilot and asked one question. "What can you tell me about this photo of Francesco Saverio Basile? He was born in Colle Sannita, Benevento, Italy in 1832. In 1861 he was killed by the Piedmontese Army as a brigand."

Whenever you use AI to learn about something, follow the sources. What you'll see is a helpful summary, but follow the sources to learn more.

Copilot confirmed this is a mid-19th-century Italian studio portrait. It pointed me to a website that talks about Francesco Saverio Basile. His nickname was Pilorusso because of his red hair. (I know that is true.) Based in a forest, he led guerilla actions against the new Italian authorities in 1861.

I knew about Pilorusso because a man from my grandfather's hometown wrote a book on the brigands in 2022. When I saw a post about Francesco by this author, Antonio Bianco, I used vital records to see if I have a connection to this man. And I do.

The best source Copilot showed me happens to be an essay written by Antonio Bianco. Reading the essay led me to ask Copilot several follow-up questions. Here's the gist of what I learned as background to this one photograph.

  • I knew Napoleon's rule is the reason we have civil records for Italy from about 1809 to 1815. Now I've learned that Napoleon put his brother and then his brother-in-law on the throne in Naples. He must have been busy conquering elsewhere.
  • After Napoleon's defeat, things changed. The House of Bourbon (aka the French) ruled the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies from 1816 to 1860. Italy at the time consisted of a few kingdoms, states, and duchies, many under foreign rule.
  • This part's a real surprise. The Bourbons' investments made the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies prosperous before unification. I'm surprised because I know the south was not prosperous after unification.
  • A pie chart shows that before the 1861 unification of Italy, the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies held 66% of Italy's wealth. This explains why a band of rebels, or brigands, were so opposed to unification and loyal to the Bourbons.
  • My cousin Francesco led a series of assaults on local institutions, based in his hideout in a forest.
  • The governor of Benevento asked for help, and the military set out to destroy the brigands. By late 1861, my cousin is missing. Historians say the military captured and shot him.
  • Another man, Michele Caruso, becomes the leader of the brigands after Francesco's death. His second in command, Antonio Secola, is also in my family tree. They captured and shot Caruso in 1863. Secola surrendered in June 1864.
  • I can add to my family tree that Antonio Secola died in prison on the island of Elba in 21 Apr 1885. (I created a source citation for Antonio Bianco's essay and the website.) More research helped me find the prison. It's in what is now a beautiful resort town with stunning views of the Tyrrhenian Sea.

As a test, I tried the same exercise on three other AI platforms.

1. Claude AI

Claude AI impressed me. Here's what it did with the photo and a brief statement:

  • It provided a summary of facts, citing another article by Antonio Bianco as its source.
  • It led me to another source that says the military executed Francesco by a firing squad. This source contains photographs and paintings depicting the lives of the brigands.
  • Claude pointed me to a Wikipedia page that says Francesco was a former officer of the Bourbon Army.

As a follow-up question, I asked for details about Antonio Secola. I learned his marriage date, which is great because it is not found in the 1856 marriages for his hometown. His marriage banns are available, but not the marriage. Antonio's story has some fascinating tidbits. For instance, he went to jail for theft, but since he had helped build the courthouse, he managed to escape. He went home for three years!

2. NotebookLM

Using NotebookLM, I uploaded the portrait and got a response before asking anything. The photo's metadata identifies him as Francesco Saverio Basile. NotebookLM provided a very detailed description of the man and his clothing. It dated the photo in the mid-to-late 19th century.

I added the note I have with Francesco in my family tree. It says: Francesco Saverio Basile was a "briganti" known as Pelorosso (Pilèrusscè in dialect) because he had red hair. At dawn on 10 August 1861, the Piedmontese Army broke up his band of brigands, consisting of about 1,000 men. He may have died on that date.

As a response, NotebookLM:

  • went into even more detail about his facial hair
  • said his clothing is consistent with the rural brigand style of the mid-19th century in the Italian south
  • said, "His ability to lead a band of 1,000 men highlights his significant role during the period of social and political upheaval following the unification of Italy. This image serves as a rare visual record of a figure who participated in the intense resistance against the new Italian state."

It didn't cite any sources, which isn't helpful, but it suggested follow-up questions.

3. ChatGPT

The only other time I tried ChatGPT I hated it. It made up everything. This time I got more details about Francesco Saverio Basile's historical context. It mentions that brigands could be:

  1. former soldiers of the Army of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies (which I now know is Francesco's case)
  2. supporters of the deposed House of Bourbon-Two Sicilies
  3. peasants resisting new taxes or conscription
  4. local outlaws
  5. people motivated by political, economic, and personal reasons.

Every analysis of his portrait mentions his tilted hat. It seems wearing it that way was typical of rural southern Italians at the time. That's an amazing little detail I wouldn't have suspected.

Your Turn

Time to go through your family tree photo collection. Which ones hold mysteries for you? Are there any where clothing styles or automobiles may help narrow down the time and place? You owe it to yourself to see what you can learn.